AI contract review
backed by real law.

{"US":{"clause":"Provider total liability shall not exceed fees paid in 3 months. No indirect, consequential, or punitive damages.","fakeStatute":"UCC §2-999 — Unfair Liability Limitation Act","fakeText":"A liability cap unreasonably low relative to contract value shall be void as against public policy...","fakeBadge":"⚠️ Does not exist — UCC Article 2 ends at §2-725","real1Statute":"UCC §2-302 — Unconscionable Contract or Clause","real1Text":"If the court as a matter of law finds the contract or any clause to have been unconscionable at the time it was made, the court may refuse to enforce the contract...","real1Badge":"✓ Real statute — Enacted in all 50 US states","real1Url":"https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/2-302","real2Statute":"UCC §2-719 — Modification or Limitation of Remedy","real2Text":"Where circumstances cause an exclusive or limited remedy to fail of its essential purpose, remedy may be had as provided in this Act.","real2Badge":"✓ Real statute — Remedy limitation doctrine","real2Url":"https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/2-719","explainFake":"Generic AI models are trained to sound authoritative, not to be accurate. They fabricate statute numbers and legal principles that look real but do not exist.","explainReal":"PactLens retrieves verified legal provisions from its knowledge base. Every statute citation links to the official source. AI analysis is grounded in real law, not hallucinated text."},"UK":{"clause":"The Supplier shall not be liable for any loss or damage whatsoever arising from supply of the Goods. All implied warranties and conditions are excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law.","fakeStatute":"Fair Contract Terms Act 2024 — s.17 Consumer Fairness","fakeText":"Any exclusion of liability creating a significant imbalance shall be void and the offending party shall be liable for treble damages...","fakeBadge":"⚠️ This Act does not exist — AI fabricated it by combining elements of real laws","real1Statute":"UCTA 1977 — s.2 & s.3 Negligence Liability","real1Text":"A person cannot exclude or restrict liability for death or personal injury from negligence. For other loss, exclusion of negligence liability is permitted only if the term satisfies the requirement of reasonableness.","real1Badge":"✓ Real UK statute — In force since 1977","real1Url":"https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/50","real2Statute":"CRA 2015, Part 2 — Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts","real2Text":"An unfair term is not binding on the consumer. A term is unfair if, contrary to good faith, it causes a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations to the detriment of the consumer.","real2Badge":"✓ Real UK statute — Primary unfair terms legislation","real2Url":"https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/part/2","explainFake":"Generic AI invents Act names and section numbers. “Fair Contract Terms Act 2024” sounds plausible but does not exist. There is no treble damages provision in UK contract law.","explainReal":"PactLens cites the actual UCTA 1977 and CRA 2015 — real UK statutes verifiable on legislation.gov.uk."},"EU":{"clause":"Processor shall implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure security appropriate to the risk. Upon termination, Processor shall delete or return all personal data.","fakeStatute":"GDPR Article 100 — Data Processor Obligations Extension","fakeText":"Any data processor in violation shall be subject to automatic fines of 10% of global turnover, and the DPO shall be personally liable...","fakeBadge":"⚠️ GDPR has only 99 Articles. Art. 100 does not exist. No personal DPO liability provision.","real1Statute":"GDPR Art. 28 — Processor Obligations","real1Text":"Processing by a processor shall be governed by a contract that sets out the subject-matter, duration, nature and purpose of processing, the type of personal data, and the obligations and rights of the controller.","real1Badge":"✓ Real GDPR article — Mandatory DPA requirements","real1Url":"https://gdpr-info.eu/art-28-gdpr/","real2Statute":"GDPR Art. 5 — Data Processing Principles","real2Text":"Personal data shall be processed lawfully, fairly and transparently; collected for specified purposes; adequate, relevant and limited; accurate; kept no longer than necessary; and processed securely.","real2Badge":"✓ Real GDPR article — 7 foundational principles","real2Url":"https://gdpr-info.eu/art-5-gdpr/","explainFake":"Generic AI invents article numbers beyond the 99 real GDPR articles and fabricates liability regimes that do not exist.","explainReal":"PactLens retrieves the actual GDPR articles from its legal knowledge base — Art. 28 and Art. 5 are the real provisions."},"AU":{"clause":"To the extent permitted by law, all guarantees, warranties and conditions implied by statute are excluded. Buyer acknowledges no reliance on representations not expressly set out.","fakeStatute":"Fair Trading Act 2010 (Cth) — s.999 Consumer Guarantee Waiver","fakeText":"Businesses may exclude all statutory guarantees where the counterparty is a company with turnover exceeding AUD 10 million...","fakeBadge":"⚠️ No s.999 exists. ACL consumer guarantees cannot be excluded by contract.","real1Statute":"ACL s.64 — Guarantees Not to Be Excluded by Contract","real1Text":"A term of a contract is void to the extent that it purports to exclude, restrict or modify the consumer guarantees. This applies regardless of whether the purchaser read or agreed to the term.","real1Badge":"✓ Real statute — ACL s.64 voids exclusion of consumer guarantees","real1Url":"https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2021C00480","real2Statute":"ACL s.18 — Misleading or Deceptive Conduct","real2Text":"A person must not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive. This is strict liability — no intent required.","real2Badge":"✓ Real statute — Most litigated consumer protection provision","real2Url":"https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2021C00480","explainFake":"Generic AI invents section numbers and gets the law backwards — ACL prohibits excluding consumer guarantees, yet the AI fabricated a provision allowing it.","explainReal":"PactLens retrieves actual ACL provisions — s.64 voids exclusion clauses, s.18 prohibits misleading statements."},"SG":{"clause":"Any dispute shall be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration administered by SIAC. The language shall be English. This clause survives termination.","fakeStatute":"Contract Fairness Act 2022 (Cap. 400) — s.55 Mandatory Mediation","fakeText":"All commercial contracts in Singapore shall include mandatory mediation prior to arbitration. Failure to mediate renders any award unenforceable...","fakeBadge":"⚠️ Cap. 400 does not exist. Singapore has no mandatory mediation requirement.","real1Statute":"UCTA (Cap. 396) — Exclusion of Liability","real1Text":"Based on UK UCTA 1977. A person cannot exclude liability for death or personal injury from negligence. For other loss, exclusion is permitted only if the term satisfies the reasonableness test.","real1Badge":"✓ Real Singapore statute — Foundation of exclusion clause regulation","real1Url":"https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/UCTA1977","real2Statute":"IAA 1994 — s.6 Enforcement of Awards","real2Text":"An award made pursuant to an arbitration agreement may, with leave of the Court, be enforced in the same manner as a judgment. Singapore is a leading pro-arbitration jurisdiction.","real2Badge":"✓ Real Singapore statute — Foundation of arbitration enforcement","real2Url":"https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/IAA1994","explainFake":"Generic AI invents fictional Singapore statutes. “Contract Fairness Act 2022” sounds plausible but does not exist in Singapore law.","explainReal":"PactLens cites actual Singapore statutes — UCTA (Cap. 396) and IAA 1994 — both verifiable on sso.agc.gov.sg."},"CA":{"clause":"The Seller makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to merchantability or fitness for purpose. All statutory implied conditions and warranties are expressly excluded.","fakeStatute":"Federal Contract Code of Canada §99 — Commercial Exclusion Clause","fakeText":"In B2B contracts, all implied warranties may be excluded by express agreement, binding regardless of relative bargaining power...","fakeBadge":"⚠️ Canada has no federal contract code. Contract law is provincial.","real1Statute":"Ontario SGA, RSO 1990 — ss.14-15 Implied Terms","real1Text":"In a contract of sale, implied conditions: goods shall be of merchantable quality; where buyer makes known the purpose, goods shall be fit for that purpose. Exclusion in B2B requires reasonableness.","real1Badge":"✓ Real Ontario statute — Implied quality and fitness in every sale","real1Url":"https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90s01","real2Statute":"Québec CCQ Art. 1373 — Good Faith Obligation","real2Text":"The parties shall conduct themselves in good faith both at the time the obligation arises and when performed or extinguished. In Québec civil law, this duty is mandatory and cannot be excluded.","real2Badge":"✓ Real Québec Civil Code — Good faith is non-waivable","real2Url":"https://www.legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/document/cs/CCQ-1991","explainFake":"Generic AI invents a federal contract code — but Canada has no federal contract code. Québec follows civil law, other provinces follow common law.","explainReal":"PactLens retrieves actual provincial statutes — Ontario SGA (common law) and Québec CCQ (civil law) — reflecting Canada’s real bijural system."},"HK":{"clause":"Employer may terminate at any time without notice if Employee fails performance targets for two quarters. Employee waives all severance, long service payment, and statutory entitlements.","fakeStatute":"Employment Protection Act (Cap. 600) — Performance-Based Termination","fakeText":"An employer may terminate without notice where employee fails performance targets for two assessment periods. No claim for severance or long service payment shall arise...","fakeBadge":"⚠️ Cap. 600 does not exist. Employees cannot waive statutory HK employment rights.","real1Statute":"Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) — s.9 Summary Dismissal","real1Text":"An employer may summarily dismiss only if the employee: (a) willfully disobeys a lawful order; (b) misconducts; (c) commits fraud or dishonesty; or (d) is habitually neglectful. Poor performance alone is NOT grounds.","real1Badge":"✓ Real HK statute — Summary dismissal requires misconduct","real1Url":"https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap57","real2Statute":"Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) — ss.31R-31RA Severance & LSP","real2Text":"An employee with 24+ months continuous service is entitled to severance payment if dismissed by redundancy. An employee with 5+ years is entitled to long service payment. These rights CANNOT be waived by contract.","real2Badge":"✓ Real HK statute — Statutory severance and LSP are non-waivable","real2Url":"https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap57","explainFake":"Generic AI invents fictional Hong Kong ordinances. In HK, employees cannot waive statutory severance rights, and poor performance is not summary dismissal grounds.","explainReal":"PactLens retrieves the actual Employment Ordinance (Cap. 57) — real HK legislation verifiable on elegislation.gov.hk."}}